On the Wrong Track
by Bernard W. Bail, M.D.
INTRODUCTION
According to an article in the
Huffington Post, a majority of Americans feel the country is on the wrong
track. I think if the citizens of all the countries were polled, the answer
would be the same.
I find it interesting that my
attendance at the International Psychoanalytic Association Meeting in Mexico
City brought me to the same conclusion about the trends of the discipline at
this time. Of course I am not a majority but I do have an alternate route to
travel, which may bias me somewhat.
From the various seminars I attended,
my impression was that the members are either troubled or wearing a mantel of
arrogance. Their speech says to everyone, “I know this stuff, I have it down
cold,” (the Freudian paradigm). Never mind that the hundred some year model
was found insufficient years ago. Recently at the American Psychoanalytic
Association meeting San Francisco, in his plenary address, Dr. Morris Eagle
said in diplomatic language that many analysts do not believe the tenents put
down by Freud as realizable, such as self knowledge. The truth about oneself
and/or the truth about the reality we live in. This comment elicitied no
visible response in the large audience. I heard no one gainsaying it after the
meeting when people are apt to gather in small groups and talk.
Perhaps this comment verifies the
political scene in Washington and in the country; a politics that enables any
politician to unabashedly lie about anything, to be hipocritical about
anything, to be shameless about nothing.
To live in a world that cannot be
sustained by truth and by the belief there is a truth to a life and to the
reality to which we are born and live – is to live in a reality without meaning
and without morality.
It is living again in the barbaric
times of ancient civilizations where the only law was that of physical
strength.
This abyss of ignorance and decency
has not yet come to the analytic community but there is a quietness, I felt a
greyness, I would say a depressiveness, that invaded this group of learned men
and women.
In one session on the UNCONSCIOUS a
middle aged analyst kept perseverating about Freud’s category of primary
process and secondary process. It was difficult to know exactly what the stumbling
block was for him for it would be impolite to ask a colleague of experience
“what exactly troubles you about this category of primary process?” There was
a discussion about Freud’s theory and, congruent to this discussion, someone
threw out the question “how would it go if there were no theory?”
Unthinkable! How would one venture forth to do their work? So back to Freud.
It was embarassing to me that one
hundred years after Freud put forward his ideas there are really no ground
breaking new ideas. At least none that I heard in this congress.
There were older colleageues that I
saw and there were some of my patients there as well. I thought this would be
interesting in the sense that I knew that my patients as well as I would dream
about this experience. I, therefore, wish to present the impression of a
patient of mine by presenting her dreams. For me this unconscious revelation
tells the whole story. The dream has no reason to lie or rationalize. The
unconscious, being a part of Divine Mind, can only tell the truth.
FIRST SESSION
Patient: I had a lot of dreams. It was
also a bit of a tough weekend. I feel like the conference was just not that
exciting. There were very smart people and they said a lot of very smart
things, but overall it just seemed like there was no real soul to it, no real
sense that, at the heart of it all, there are patients that need a treatment.
Some of the different discussion groups were interesting, but overall I wasn’t
even that excited by the topics. Usually the titles at least interest me.
This time, I wasn’t even that intrigued by the offerings.
Dr. Bail: You mean it was slim
pickings?
Patient: Yes, very. I was dreaming
quite a lot too. Last night I had a dream.
DREAM
I am in a room and there is a birthday party
and my friend Agatha is there. I am sitting at a table next to a Mexican boy
who is around 12 years old and he is big for his age. He is sort of tall and
has a large build. Then someone gives him a box and he opens it. Inside are
clothes for a Snoopy doll and I say to myself, “God damn it, no one will give
up the baby clothes.”
ASSOCIATIONS
Patient: Agatha is the one whose
father has been sick in the hospital. He has been unconscious and it was very
uncertain whether he would make it or not. He is starting to do a little
better now, but is very weak. Her father isn’t really in the dream, but I am
aware that he has been ill and she has been at the hospital with him. It was
also her birthday a few days ago. It isn’t her birthday in the dream, but it
is someone’s birthday. It feels like it is a little kid’s birthday. There
might be signs hanging up. It is like an apartment, but I am not sure who
lives there. I am sitting at this little table. It sits between the kitchen
and the living room. There might be a cake sitting on the table as well. I
don’t know the boy sitting next to me and it isn’t his birthday. I don’t even
know who hands him the box. The clothes are inside the box.
I used to have a Snoopy doll. It was
a little stuffed dog and there were clothes for it so you could dress him up in
a tuxedo or as a cowboy. I don’t even remember what outfits I had for him. I
think I liked to dress him up, but I was never one of those kids that played
make believe games. My sister and I were talking about that the other day. She
was talking about how when we were little, I would set up these elaborate
houses for our dolls, but I never liked to actually play with them. I just
wasn’t that kind of person. I wish I could have been. I always wanted to
believe in Santa Claus or the Tooth Fairy, but I never could. I was like a
little adult.
So these clothes were small. They
were little doll clothes and I just thought that no one wants to give up his or
her baby self. I was frustrated.
INTERPRETATION
Dr. Bail: Psychoanalysis is sick as
shown by Agatha’s father. All the analysts would have to let go of their baby
clothes. Really, all people have to give up their “baby parts,” or baby
clothes, and psychoanalysis has to turn to a theory that focuses on that. They
have to get to the infantile roots or it will not work.
SESSION. THE
FOLLOWING DAY
I was thinking about yesterday’s
session and the conference and I had two dreams.
DREAMS
In the first part, I am at a restaurant and
I see my friend Tamera. She is wearing a very short gray mini dress and I go
up to her and I see that her buttocks is hanging out. I pull down the dress a
little and then I notice that she is very thin and her pelvic bones are visible
and her legs have a very wide space between them. The dress is nice, but she
is so very thin. I also see that she has a scarf tied around her head, but I
can’t tell at first whether it is a bandage or not because it is beige and
pretty large.
In the second part of the dream, I am in a
little house, like a cottage. There are guests coming over and I am showing
them the house. It is small in the front where you enter. It has a little
garden and picket fence. It is very charming. When we go inside and head
further into the interior of the house, it is very clear that there is a
recent, modern addition. There is a great room, a dining room and doors that
open onto a patio. It is really nice and it keeps the architectural style of
the old house, the same type of roofline, but it is clearly contemporary and
very lovely. It is nicely decorated and I am amazed at the amount of space it
has. I leave the guests and go upstairs to a bedroom and I seem to have a lot
of my things there. Maybe it is a vacation home, but it seems that I live
there some of the time. I am not completely sure, but I have many things in
the bedroom. I look in a small box, a jewelry box on a desk. I realize that I
have a lot of very beautiful gold jewelry. Some of it has stones and metal
work. The jewelry is really nice and I put on a ring and then I try on another.
I am sort of shocked that there is so much abundance. I had forgotten that I
had so much and I am surprised and pleased to see so many choices. I think I
am looking for a tray to put some perfume on, to protect the desk just in case
the bottles leak, and I find it.
ASSOCIATIONS
Patient: I think I was still figuring
out the conference and what we were talking about yesterday. I think I also
wanted to feel like even though I don’t really use the same theories or ways of
describing things, that I still understand people. They are really smart and
there is no denying that, but at some point there is a lot of talking about
things that are either very old or seem like minute details that don’t matter
very much if your whole understanding of the person is off. If you can
understand the main idea, then it is fine to argue about what the exact mental
process is. If you miss your patients, then it really doesn’t matter what the
exact mechanism is that lead to a thought. I don’t want to take anything away
form them. They are all very smart. I just felt like it doesn’t really get to
the main issue of the patients.
The dress that Tamera was wearing was
very nice. It was like a gray mesh and when you layer it, it becomes opaque.
It was just very short. So when I walk over to her, I see I need to pull it
down for her. She is exposing herself. She doesn’t seem to notice at all.
She doesn’t say anything about my pulling her dress down and she shows no
embarrassment. Then I notice how thin her legs are. It is like I can see
through the lower part of the dress and actually see that her legs are very far
apart and I think I can see her bones. I saw this woman in one of the discussion
groups that I thought was either anorectic or ill. She was sitting in the
front of the room and had on a very skimpy summer dress. I could see her spine
and her shoulder bones jutting out from under the skin. I was sort of
distracted by it and I wondered whether it was an analyst or a patient. There
were a lot of female analysts there who were very nicely dressed, very chic
also. The dress in the dream is very nice. It is just very short.
In the second part, I think it is like
a vacation cottage, but there has clearly been a big addition to it. It is
very charming and pretty and there is a garden in the front and lots of
greenery. I am not sure whom I am showing around the property, but it might be
friends. My family is there I think, but I don’t see them. I seem to have a
lot of my things there, but I can’t quite remember putting them there. There
is a lot of stuff there though. There is all the jewelry and other items as
well. I am happy to see it all and can’t quite believe I have it all. It is
quite a difference between the skinny legs of my friend and this beautiful
house and all the jewelry. I have thought a lot about what I heard at the
meetings and I have to wonder where I would be if I had that type of analysis
instead of yours. I think I would not have gone into this field. I think I
would be in very bad shape. I have been feeling very grateful that I had this
type of treatment.
INTERPRETATION
Dr. Bail: I think you are saying that
the unconscious talked about at the meetings is very thin. That is also why
the scarf looks like a bandage. The old theories do not offer very much for
the unconscious. The house, in contrast, is a very large and abundant place.
It is a representation of my new theory. It is built on traditional
psychoanalysis, the small house, but it expands it a great deal. The
conference showed people who are at the height of psychoanalytic thinking
internationally, but your dream says that it is very thin. It doesn’t offer
the patients enough. The abundance of the second dream shows what is possible.
COMMENTARY
These
are simple, complying dreams that put the pointer precisely on the problem. It
is however not only a problem for psychoanalysis. In a way the revelation in
the dream is so clear that it has a painfulness to it when one lets the
emotional waves come in. It means that not only are analysts suffering and do
not consciously know it but their patients are suffering as well.
It is axiomatic that patients can only acquire self
knowledge to the extent that the analyst has explored the limits of his own. I
can verify this psychological fact with several examples but I will only say
that in one seminar a patient dreamed that she wished her analyst would stop
“feeding her from a book.” A tragic dream to her for there is nothing anyone
can do for that patient or for that analyst especially when one is a guest. To
bring this problem into the country and the world at large we can see the
parallels. It is striking how a damaged person can reflect the damage and its
impact on that particular life.
Accordingly it is possible to go to this country, which
is so swamped by conflict, in so many lies given credence by shameless
politicians. Obviously there have been elected to public office an incredible
number of damaged (psychologically) people. It follows that damaged people can
only produce damaged solutions. There is no balance to a distraught mind and
heart. We must remember that the universe is run by laws that require
balance. This is true in science, equally true of the world of human beings
who might be looked at as trillions of electro-magnetic bits of energy
pulsating away. Universal intent is to balance the universe. There would be
pulsations of great discord indicating great discord in matter, of which we
certainly are an example.
Today we can look at this discord registered in America
and across the sea to a bombing in Norway, riots in London, civil wars in the
Middle East, wars in Africa and militaristic camps in North Korea and Burma;
disquiet around the globe.
A train running on the wrong track will have to get on
the right track. This common sense fact leads to the question “how?” The
answer is to change the paradigm by which one is living. Not easily done!
Any analyst knows that patients may come quickly to have
their pain removed. Medication might be able to do that. Those more serious
people may want more than medication. If so – to the surprise of the patient -
there are powerful forces within them that absolutely refuse to let that
happen, even if it is of benefit to them. Here the knowledge and skill of the
analyst are of paramount importance in “dueling” with this “conservative
force”. I say conservative because it wants no change, whatever the
consequence to the personality.
Now multiply that by millions in this country, and some
six billion in the world. Unknown to themselves they are prisoners of an
unconscious imprint given to them unknowingly, unwittingly, unconsciously by
their mother. I have written about this extensively in other essays. It is
the saga of the Internal Saboteur.
Therefore, when we come to the train metaphor, there can
be no getting on the right track unless the train on the wrong track crashes.
Metaphorically translated to the personality, it is usually at this point that
patients come for help. At this point one can build the correct track and a
correct train to run on that track. Even here the choice is the patient’s.
This is what must be done in society at large, in all
societies. The discontent in the world is the result of a paradigm that the
world, each country, each culture has been running on uneasily and not to well
for far too long.
To those that can envisage the long march of humanity,
its ups and downs, to those that are open to new ideas, I say the new paradigm
has to acknowledge the existence of the unconscious, has to listen to its
cornucopia of knowledge which enables me to remind the reader – consider how
thin is the unconscious in the patient’s dream. Psychoanalysis, like the
world, has reached a dead end. All it can do is put bandaids on a threadbare
garment, a garment that does not exist anymore, only shreds of numerous
bandaids.
Since this rave has begun imbalance has become more
marked and I think certain groups have hunkered down, like the Tea Party, the
Republican Party or the Evangelicals. Again I think it will not matter anymore
whether one hunkers down on the shore when a tsunami is on the way.
I can say this because history shows elevated civilizations
have been leveled to rubble, civilizations with intelligent men such as every
country has today. Intelligence will not matter. As the unconscious is
portrayed in the patient’s dream, it is even thinner in the halls of power in
every capital of the world. In fact the concept of an unconscious does not
exist in those worlds.
A universal law is now in effect and no one can stop it.
We cannot aim a nuclear bomb at it. One cannot fight this force because it of
Divine origin, by which I mean scientific. It is Divine Mind that rules
everything in the universe of which we are a miniscule, though important part.
******************
In this context I would like to bring in a dream of the
old man from “Venice Beach”, a patient I have written about throughout his
course of treatment with me.
He begins the session with an expression of his disgust
(not alone) with the interagency of the Tea Party members of Congress, of the
placation the Republicans have shown them. Most have gone to the
administration, to Obama, for his willingness to give away the store. The old
man remembers that Wall Street money backed Obama’s election and he guesses
Obama is helpless to do anything except listen to his backers and slowly
dissolve the social gains made from post World War II under the leadership of
FDR.
He has not become depressed. He is aware that there
seems to be a greater event happening unknown consciously to us. But he says
he has a presentament. “My dream is that there is a war between Israel and
Egypt and somehow the balance is tipped to Israel. “ After a silence he said,
“I don’t know why I think of Israel really, the people who fled Egypt, the
whole Moses thing. I am wondering how did this guy get to do what we are told
by the Biblical story? Why did people follow him and how did he know to walk
up Mt. Nebo to get the laws? Really, to conclude there is only one God?”
Patient: You know, Dr. Bail, I realize I was thinking
about this while sitting looking at the ocean the other day. I spend many hours
looking at the ocean. Sometimes I fall into a reverie, sometimes I fall
asleep, sometimes an idea comes from who knows where. There is something
leveling if one looks at the ocean all the time. People seem to recede in the
background. The important people, about whom the media talk, are not
important. It seems as if very little is important. The ocean is important
and the clouds and the sky. You know, and I know you know, the Jews were
slaves and he freed them. Maybe it’s true and there is a metaphor here that
Moses represents the essence of change of consciousness. He made the world he
lived in believe there was only one God. As you would say, this is an
evolution of human spirituality and a big one.
Dr. B: I agree with the metaphor. I think you are
seeing this upheaval in the United States and in the world as not simply ugly
times.
Patient: I recalled the end of the dream, which was that
action is taken so that in time the leader must act responsibly, and I think he
does.
Dr. B: That’s a good end. To continue, I think I see
you this massive change of consciousness in the world. It is called the “new
world”. The dream is saying that humanity will again “cross the Red Sea” or
move beyond a certain level of their flow of consciousness and enter into a new
collective domain of awareness. I think you are flowing again in the universe
in your dream time.
Patient: I feel old, weathered, as I watch the ocean.
All as if I were a star in the heavens seeing it all unfold amidst all the folly
of people. Once I was pretty foolish myself.
CONCLUSION
It seems to me a predominant task currently on earth is
to discover what our goal is and ask the much asked question “why are we
here”. Our goal must be with a greater design of the universe while living our
lives on the earth plain.
I think it does not have to be so hard here, so full of
anxiety and terror, so unbalanced, so loveless. There are troubled peoples
feelings and designs veering off into awkward direction with insufficient
and/or false knowledge. We must look to our most precious asset, The Feminine
Unconscious.
Copyright © Bernard
W. Bail, M.D.
August
2011
|